prelink performance gains

Reindl Harald h.reindl at thelounge.net
Tue Oct 15 20:29:38 UTC 2013



Am 15.10.2013 22:17, schrieb Jan Kratochvil:
> On Tue, 15 Oct 2013 22:12:00 +0200, Matthew Miller wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 09:05:03PM +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
>>> 	i=0;time while [ $i -lt 1000 ];do /usr/bin/gnome-open --help &>/dev/null;i=$[$i+1];done
>>
>> I hope we can all agree that this is not useful example.
> 
> Explained in:
> 	https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-October/190274.html
> 
>> The complexity affects end uesrs. For example, a few years ago, a bad update
>> to prelink broke everyone's systems.
> 
> We are back at the issue that every feature means more code/complexity

*we* are the whole thread about the question if prelinks preformance
gains in thereality are really worth the additional complexity

*you* are *now back* to the issue

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 263 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20131015/95ca4792/attachment.sig>


More information about the devel mailing list