prelink performance gains

[Reindl Harald]

Am 15.10.2013 20:54, schrieb Chris Adams:
> Once upon a time, Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil at redhat.com> said:
>> You can always make your software development life more simple by giving up on
>> some useful feature.  That -O2 vs. -O0 build is a good comparison.
> 
> Since you keep repeating this one: -O2 vs. -O0 has a significant
> performance gain.  The message that started this thread indicates that
> prelink may not have a significant gain anymore.  If that's the case,
> than _any_ effort is not worth the added complexity, overhead, etc. of
> prelink

forget it - he is just trolling and not interested ina technical
discussion or numbers proving the gain of prelink

otherwise he would prove it or if he can't do so stop defeat
prelink because in case of no significant gain it's pretty
clear that prelink should no longer be in the default install

besides negative impact because: *any* running code with out
a real beenfit is *bad* for maintainence and security reasons

period

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 263 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20131015/fa864361/attachment.sig>