aarch64 support bugs obsolete?

[Alec Leamas]

On 2013-10-17 04:30, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
> On 10/16/2013 07:15 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>> If your package uses the %configure macro, I would feel free to close
>> them as either invalid or fixed as that macro handles it.  If your
>> package doesn't, you have more checking/work to do.
>
> Thanks for replying- this slipped through my inbox.  You can also see 
> if your package was built successfully by visiting 
> http://arm-temp.ausil.us/pub/fedora-arm/stage4/http://arm-temp.ausil.us/pub/fedora-arm/stage4/ 
> - If the are rpms in the subdir of your package name, it probably 
> means your package is good to go.  The only exception is if there is a 
> ".x1" (or x2, x3, x4) in the NVR- in which case we added some patches 
> to make it build.
>
Hm, I get 404 on that URL?!

--alec