systemd bugs in F20/F21 -> bug against the distribution?

[Adam Williamson]

On Thu, 2014-04-03 at 19:31 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> will that below ever get fixed in F20?

> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1072368

The developer does not consider it to be a bug. You may disagree, but so
far, you don't seem to have convinced him or any other systemd
developers or, well, anyone else.

> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010572

This is an entirely trivial issue: a failed attempt to access something
with no apparent negative consequences. Doesn't seem like it'd be a high
priority. It also doesn't seem like it would be too difficult to track
down and propose a fix, if it's bugging you so much.

> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=626477

You yourself have reported in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=626477#c44 that this is
fixed on the systemd 208 branch, which F20 is tracking. Then you went
nuts and started yelling at people, which as you've been told fifty six
thousand goddamn times by now, never ever helps. From the latest
comments it sounds like whenever f20 is updated to the latest
systemd-208 code, this fix will come in. It's up to the package
maintainer when they want to do that.

> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047148

Apparently fixed in 20 and Rawhide, you just want a backport to 19?

> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1024379

Is another extremely trivial one: you're throwing your toys out of the
pram over slightly sub-optimal autocomplete? Really?
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net