Mass bug proposal: packages that auto-enable systemd units

Kevin Fenzi kevin at scrye.com
Wed Apr 23 16:06:52 UTC 2014


On Wed, 23 Apr 2014 08:49:58 -0700
Andrew Lutomirski <luto at mit.edu> wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 7:02 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> <zbyszek at in.waw.pl> wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 12:17:10PM -0700, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> >> Examples of "runs once then goes away" services
> >> include iptables and udev.
> > I removed udev from this paragraph on the wiki, since it's
> > persistent and is a bad example.
> 
> Thanks :)
> 
> If no one tells me otherwise today, I will take the lack of objections
> to the mass bug filing as consensus.

It seems like it might be workable to have a provenpackager fix up any
of these not fixed in a few weeks...

If you would like to add to the text that after 3 weeks provenpackagers
may step in and fix these issues, that might be good? Or is there some
reason that wouldn't be a good idea?

kevin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20140423/21d45a73/attachment.sig>


More information about the devel mailing list