Fedora.NEXT Products and the fate of Spins

[Chris Murphy]

On Feb 2, 2014, at 6:33 AM, Solomon Peachy <pizza at shaftnet.org> wrote:

> On Sat, Feb 01, 2014 at 11:06:18PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> I don't understand why we are doing that "Fedora.NEXT" thing in the 
>> first place. It's a lot of change for the sake of change, without any 
>> idea whether the output will be better than the status quo, or even 
>> whether there will be any (usable) output at all!
> 
> For what my opinion is worth (as someone who's been around since the 
> RHL4.1 days) I have to agree. 


I think this is a good summary of what it's all about and what it isn't.

https://www.happyassassin.net/2014/01/31/good-morning-bugfixing-and-thinking-about-fedora-next/



Chris Murphy