Fedora.NEXT Products and the fate of Spins

[Dan Mashal]

On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 2:40 AM, Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh at redhat.com> wrote:
> I won't speak for all of FESCo, but I'm leaning towards: "Spins can
> continue just as they are, while being aware that they continue to be
> secondary to our primary deliverables". (Yes, I'm aware of the
> KDE-as-release-blocker rule and we'll address that individually).
>
> So new spins and existing Spins are fine (in my opinion) as long as
> someone is caring for and feeding them.

Thanks, that's good news.

Dan