Proposal to WGs and rel-eng: Move 90-default.preset from systemd to fedora-release

[Colin Walters]

On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 10:02 AM, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler at chello.at> 
wrote:
> Matthew Miller wrote:
>>  That seems reasonable, and in that case, something like 
>> "fedora-presets"
>>  and "fedora-workstation-presets", etc., seems appropriate, and the
>>  corresponding release package could pull them in.
>> 
> What about my proposal to drop the preset directly onto the file 
> system (but 
> in /etc rather than in /usr/share as we do now) in the live 
> kickstarts? 
> 
That would mean that if we wanted to enable a new service by default, 
admins wouldn't get it on upgrades.  Which may be fine with the 
traditional rpm-on-client-side installs.

But I think this "upgrades diverge from fresh reinstalls" is a deeply 
fundamental problem - one I am simply not allowing to occur in the 
OSTree replication model.



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20140214/a7b63edc/attachment.html>