dnf versus yum
tmlcoch at redhat.com
Mon Jan 6 15:12:34 UTC 2014
----- Original Message -----
> Am 06.01.2014 14:06, schrieb Vít Ondruch:
> > Also, I'd like to point out that "yum/dnf remove" by default shows what it
> > is going to do and you have to
> > explicitly confirm the action, isn't it enough? How much protection do you
> > need?
> to say it clear - *all* protection to avoid breaking the system
> otherwise as example i would not have learned which packages can
> be removed resulting in strip down some Fedora servers to 600 MB
> what *never* must happen is that YUM or DNF are killing itself, rpm
> or render the setup unbootable - period - there is *nothing* to discuss
Hm, so the rm should refuse to do "rm /usr/bin/rm", chmod: "chmod -x /usr/bin/chmod", etc., am I getting it right?
More information about the devel