Reindl Harald h.reindl at thelounge.net
Sun Jan 12 17:46:26 UTC 2014

Am 12.01.2014 18:43, schrieb Garry T. Williams:
> On 1-12-14 11:39:35 Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Garry T. Williams  wrote:
>>> On 1-9-14 15:43:50 Ales Kozumplik wrote:
>>>> New DNF release is out. See the blog [1], the release notes [2] and
>>>> the F20 update [3]. Rawhide build went smooth this time too!
>>> I see this using 0.4.11.  What am I doing wrong?
>> http://dnf.baseurl.org/2014/01/02/dnf-update-and-yum-update-produce-different-output/
> Yes, I have reviewed all that.  That reference says,
>     The bottom line is: unless a real update problem occurs (i.e. DNF
>     refuses to update a package that Yum updates) with the same set of
>     metadata (dnf clean all; yum clean all), this is not an issue.
> I did dnf clean all and the updates-testing package is still not found
> by dnf.
> Hey, I'm just testing.  It looks like a bug, but I wanted to see if I
> was overlooking something

if DNF for whatever reason is chosing a different mirror than
YUM you have exactly this - the same may happen with only YUM
and repeatly "rpm -rf /var/cache/yum/*; yum upgrade" by get
a different mirror each time

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 246 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20140112/4dfdf492/attachment.sig>

More information about the devel mailing list