Snapshotting for rollback after updates was[ Re: Drawing lessons from fatal SELinux bug #1054350]

[Reindl Harald]

Am 27.01.2014 00:51, schrieb Chris Murphy:
> On Jan 26, 2014, at 4:29 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote:
> 
>> do yourself and everybody a favour and
>>
>> * don't claim others are rude while you talk like above and worser half of the thread
>> * don't talk about things above your technical scope
>> * discuss with software engineers while lacking basic understanding of the topic
>>
>> posts like yours in that thread belongs to the users list and *not* to a development list
> 
> Request declined.
> 
> You are the only person who has suggested a method of rollbacks that fundamentally would not work

are you drunken?

i have *not* requested any method of rollback

i just gave a few warnings what problems has to be considered if rollbacks
of snapshots are taken as possible solution - so *stop* talk to threads if
you have no clue about the topic and about who said what

* read what others said
* start at the begin of the thread doing that
* try to understand what you read before commetn any word
* look at the *context* of several posts becaus eoyu need that information to understand
* after that claim what people suggested or in reality you would say nothing at all


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 246 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20140127/45419936/attachment.sig>