Fedora.NEXT Products and the fate of Spins
cschalle at redhat.com
Thu Jan 30 10:40:40 UTC 2014
The difference here is that the resources for GNOME (or anything else Red Hat needs for future versions of RHEL) are
provided by Red Hat. So if you want the spins to the logically the same in terms of resources we should start demanding
that any spin set up needs to provide an annual monetary contribution to help pay for the Fedora infrastructure and team.
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Frank Murphy" <frankly3d at gmail.com>
> To: devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 9:06:24 AM
> Subject: Re: Fedora.NEXT Products and the fate of Spins
> On Wed, 29 Jan 2014 18:58:22 -0500
> Josh Boyer <jwboyer at fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> > I consider myself squarely in the middle of those two camps. I think
> > they have value to people. I think they fill a niche, however large
> > or small it might be. I also think they can be done by the people
> > wishing to provide them without relying on Fedora resources for
> > hosting and creation (outside of leveraging existing packages and
> > repositories).
> That doesn't sound right,
> logically below would also be true.
> Gnome is a fairly big Spin,
> and can eat up quite a lot of resources.
> Maybe it should be outsourced.
> devel mailing list
> devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
More information about the devel