Fedora.NEXT Products and the fate of Spins

piruthiviraj natarajan piruthiviraj at gmail.com
Thu Jan 30 10:45:51 UTC 2014

On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 4:10 PM, Christian Schaller <cschalle at redhat.com>wrote:

> The difference here is that the resources for GNOME (or anything else Red
> Hat needs for future versions of RHEL) are
> provided by Red Hat. So if you want the spins to the logically the same in
> terms of resources we should start demanding
> that any spin set up needs to provide an annual monetary contribution to
> help pay for the Fedora infrastructure and team.

So you mean to say the software(already existing in the repos)  which is
not of interest for red hat should pay to stay for fedora infrastructure
and Team to stay in the fedora repos?

This looks like clear business motive and no point in calling it a
community project at all.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20140130/9c705867/attachment.html>

More information about the devel mailing list