Handling package conflicts caused by arch specific doc files

[Reindl Harald]

Am 03.07.2014 13:33, schrieb drago01:
> On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Kalev Lember <kalevlember at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 07/03/2014 01:05 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>> /home/builduser/rpmbuild/RPMS:
>>> total 44K
>>> drwxr-xr-x 2 builduser builduser 4.0K 2014-06-30 17:09 noarch
>>> drwxr-xr-x 2 builduser builduser  36K 2014-07-02 22:44 x86_64
>>
>> Thanks, this actually backs up what I claimed -- that it's uncommon to
>> build i686 packages on an x86_64 host. You only have an x86_64 directory
>> here.
> 
> Again -devel packages are not only used / useful for building rpms

that's true

but usually you don't ./configure && make && make install for a i686
binary on a x86_64 machine since it's anyways a local build

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 246 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20140703/f40b340d/attachment.sig>