Handling package conflicts caused by arch specific doc files

[drago01]

On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 1:37 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote:
>
>
> Am 03.07.2014 13:33, schrieb drago01:
>> On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Kalev Lember <kalevlember at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 07/03/2014 01:05 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>>> /home/builduser/rpmbuild/RPMS:
>>>> total 44K
>>>> drwxr-xr-x 2 builduser builduser 4.0K 2014-06-30 17:09 noarch
>>>> drwxr-xr-x 2 builduser builduser  36K 2014-07-02 22:44 x86_64
>>>
>>> Thanks, this actually backs up what I claimed -- that it's uncommon to
>>> build i686 packages on an x86_64 host. You only have an x86_64 directory
>>> here.
>>
>> Again -devel packages are not only used / useful for building rpms
>
> that's true
>
> but usually you don't ./configure && make && make install for a i686
> binary on a x86_64 machine since it's anyways a local build

Skip the "make install" part ... Also sometimes I do write code myself
that for whatever reason I have to give out as 32bit binary ... which
requires -devel packages when a library is used.