Current FTBFS packages (was Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 21)

Matthew Garrett mjg59 at srcf.ucam.org
Tue Jun 10 18:31:27 UTC 2014


On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 07:11:53PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 07:05:56PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> 
> > In this case however I don't think much productive came from this
> > discussion we had about hfsplus-tools.  Obviously no one wants
> > hfsplus-tools and/or clang enough on Fedora/ARM that they are prepared
> > to fix it.  So I think we should just drop it on ARM, and let anyone
> > who wants it, fix it later (or reenable %{arm} if clang gets fixed).
> 
> If the Fedora/ARM community don't care about feature parity with x86, 
> then we should just drop them back to secondary status.

That was overly critical of me and did nothing to actually further the 
discussion. I apologise.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59 at srcf.ucam.org


More information about the devel mailing list