Incorrect order of /usr/bin and /usr/sbin in path

[Jon Kent]

Hi,

That's my recollection as well. Heard that confusion about sbin being for
superuser before.

Jon
 On 5 May 2014 15:29, "Adam Jackson" <ajax at redhat.com> wrote:

> On Sun, 2014-05-04 at 18:59 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> > however, the semantics of /usr/sbin is to contain superuser
> > binaries which should not be overriden because a binary
> > with the same name exists in /usr/bin
>
> My memory is that the "s" was more for "static" not "superuser".
> There's some conceptual overlap, static binaries being there to recover
> even if your shared libraries are hosed which is normally a "superuser"
> kind of operation, but.
>
> - ajax
>
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20140505/5109b0af/attachment.html>