Bumping python-requests in f20?

[Ralph Bean]

On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 01:15:14PM +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
> On 10/23/2014 10:57 PM, Ralph Bean wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 01:16:29PM -0700, Ed Marshall wrote:
> >> Is it API-compatible?
> > 
> > Not exactly https://github.com/kennethreitz/requests/blob/master/HISTORY.rst#230-2014-05-16
> 
> I would personally say no to updating libraries to incompatible
> versions. We already have way too much churn in F20; doing the update
> would mean updating and retesting anything that uses python-requests.
> And not just testing the packages in Fedora, this could also potentially
> break 3rd party programs that people might have written in house.
> 
> Maybe just tell the users who were asking for an update to switch to
> F21? It's really close now and I know several people who are using it
> daily on their main workstations and are very happy with it.

I'm convinced and will let it sit as is.  Thanks for writing back.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20141028/ab91e1ec/attachment.sig>