Attempting to contact two unresponsive maintainers - dajt and jpacner

[Johannes Lips]

On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 10:44 PM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin at scrye.com> wrote:

> Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses for two package
> maintainers are no longer valid.  I'm starting the unresponsive
> maintainer policy to find out if they are still interested in
> maintaining their packages (and if so, have them update their email
> addresses in FAS).  If they're not interested in maintaining or we
> can't locate them I'll have FESCo orphan the packages so that others
> can take them over.
>
Hi all,

wouldn't it make sense to integrate a check into the processes, when people
leave Redhat, that the packages in fedora are properly orphaned or get a
new owner?
I mean this should be pretty easy to implement in a company, or?

All the best,

Johannes

>
> If you have a way to contact any of these maintainers, please let them
> know that we'd appreciate knowing what to do with their packages.
> Thanks!
>
> Maintainers:
>
> * jpacner - former email address jpacner at redhat.com
>   https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packager/jpacner
>   Point of contact:     0
>   Co-maintainer:        5
>   Watched:      0
>
> * dajt - former email address fenlason at redhat.com
>   https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packager/dajt
>   Point of contact:     6
>   Co-maintainer:        3
>   Watched:      0
>
> If we don't hear anything in a week, we will be removing their acls and
> will need to find new point of contacts, etc.
>
> Thanks,
>
> kevin
>
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20140904/e3cd0df8/attachment.html>