Attempting to contact two unresponsive maintainers - dajt and jpacner

[Tomasz Torcz]

On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 11:35:43AM +0200, Johannes Lips wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 10:44 PM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin at scrye.com> wrote:
> 
> > Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses for two package
> > maintainers are no longer valid.  I'm starting the unresponsive
> > maintainer policy to find out if they are still interested in
> > maintaining their packages (and if so, have them update their email
> > addresses in FAS).  If they're not interested in maintaining or we
> > can't locate them I'll have FESCo orphan the packages so that others
> > can take them over.
> >
> Hi all,
> 
> wouldn't it make sense to integrate a check into the processes, when people
> leave Redhat, that the packages in fedora are properly orphaned or get a
> new owner?

  Why would even someone's employment status matter?  Fedora is a community project.

-- 
Tomasz Torcz                "Funeral in the morning, IDE hacking
xmpp: zdzichubg at chrome.pl    in the afternoon and evening." - Alan Cox