Question about profile.d scripts definition in Spec file

[Jonathan Underwood]

On 2 August 2015 at 22:57, Jonathan Underwood
<jonathan.underwood at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2 August 2015 at 15:29, Marcin Haba <marcin.haba at bacula.pl> wrote:
>> My image of configuration files is that they are files for read/write
>> purpose by design, because they enables _configure_ something
>> (application, service, single program, script...whatever). If they are
>> dedicated only for reading then from my point of view they lose
>> "configuration" meaning (something like WORM storage ;-) ).
>>
>
> This is probably an argument for having shell configuration fragments
> packaged under /usr/lib/bash/profile.d rather than /etc/profile.d.

.. or /usr/share/bash/profile.d, perhaps.