on software updates
fweimer at redhat.com
Tue Feb 3 16:22:57 UTC 2015
On 02/02/2015 04:50 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
>> On 31 January 2015 at 21:57, Casey Jao <casey.jao at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Are there any plans to let packages specify that they do not require a
>>> system reboot to be updated?
>> Yes, see https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/SandboxedApps -- basically,
>> you can't do updates of rpm-sourced system-wide app deployments
>> without a reboot in a safe way.
> There are classes of RPMs that definitely can be done without a reboot in a safe way (documentation-only; packages with a single executable and no libraries / separate data files; and quite a few other cases), and letting packagers opt them in to being updated without a reboot seems like a clear improvement on the status quo.
And updates of sandboxed apps will need system-wide (or even larger)
coordination once they start to interact with each other, so it's
essentially the same affair as with RPM: Doing the right thing requires
And to be honest, reboots aren't the problem, it's state loss on
Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security
More information about the devel