Systemd, Spamassassin, and the Missing Portreserve Package

Tom Rivers tom at
Thu Feb 5 21:31:55 UTC 2015

On 2/5/2015 16:23, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> SA needs portreserve exactly for the reason portreserve was written:
> SA assigned port is 783, and there's a risk portmap will hijack it.
> Missing dependency seems like packaging bug.

Thanks for the insight, Tomasz!


More information about the devel mailing list