systemd-219 issues with 22 and Rawhide composes

Reindl Harald h.reindl at thelounge.net
Thu Feb 26 14:10:19 UTC 2015


Am 26.02.2015 um 15:05 schrieb J├│hann B. Gu├░mundsson:
> On 02/26/2015 01:29 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 05:13:53PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>>> Sure I have a stake in systemd, but certainly none in
>>> fedora-release.rpm. But even for systemd, there are a number of people
>> Sorry for the somewhat slow reply, but I've been thinking about all of
>> this.... I guess, primarily, what I'd really hope for is for _all_
>> Fedora package maintainers to feel like they have a stake in
>> fedora-release.rpm, at least in a symbolic and general sense. As Fedora
>> contributors, we should not just think about individual ownership of
>> the packages we are primarily responsible for, but also how it all fits
>> together.
>
> You will need to change the ownership model of packages in the
> distribution if you want to change that and related expectations
> regarding individual ownership.
>
> Until you do you should expect others to expect relevant maintainer(s)
> be responsible for the component they maintain

really?
why?
how do you come to that weird conclusion?

surely, one can say "not my package, not my problem" but that's ignorant 
and needs no guidelines and policies - sanity should be enough

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20150226/48839393/attachment.sig>


More information about the devel mailing list