About making noarch package arch specific, when contents differ.

Dan Callaghan dcallagh at redhat.com
Tue Jul 28 01:34:38 UTC 2015

Excerpts from paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade's message of 2015-07-27 00:05 +10:00:
> Should I make the doc packages arch specific?

Rather than trying to make Sphinx spit out bitwise-identical output on 
every arch (which sounds like fighting a losing battle), could you just 
build the doc subpackage on only one arch?

%ifarch x86_64
%package doc
BuildArch: noarch

I think Koji still counts this a regular noarch subpackage and it should 
therefore be included in the Fedora trees for all arches.

Dan Callaghan <dcallagh at redhat.com>
Senior Software Engineer, Products & Technologies Operations
Red Hat, Inc.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20150728/87aa696b/attachment.sig>

More information about the devel mailing list