Patching workflow (Was: Recommended way of proposing changes ...)

Alec Leamas leamas.alec at
Wed Oct 21 17:13:35 UTC 2015

On Sun Oct 18 20:00:23 UTC 2015 Kevin Fenzi wrote

> On Sun, 18 Oct 2015 21:41:41 +0200
> Alec Leamas <leamas.alec at> wrote:
>> Perhaps OT, but I cannot resist: Have you discussed the overall
>> workflow here? Cloning package, unpack sources, create patches, make
>> a build, revise patches, finalize the spec, perhaps upstream to
>> package owner...
> Nope. As I said this has been just some "hey, it would be nice if" type
> discussions. If someone wants to commit to head up an effort around
> this that would be great, but I don't think anyone is currently. 

I think we should do something. Just to fuel the discussion, there is a
prototype at [1] in some "works occasionally" state. Would we be better
off with something like this?




More information about the devel mailing list