Prioritising which document?

[Paul W. Frields]

On Wed, 2005-04-06 at 07:41 -0700, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi
> 
>  I don't think
> > anyone's discussed integrating Xen installation into
> > the general
> > installation guide for the first cut. 
> 
> I would like to clarify that this wasnt my intention
> either but if xen changes some part of the
> installation in a more visible way that the end users
> typically has to deal with then its important to
> document that changes in a guide targetting fc4

Understood.  I haven't looked at FC4test* yet, but we had previously
discussed on the list whether/when it made sense to start using the test
releases for writing.  I would be very surprised if Xen had been sucked
into anaconda in any meaningful way at this point, but I honestly have
no idea 'tall.  

We certainly want to make the IG accurate in any case.  At some point
before final release there will be a FC4test* evaluation and comparison
to the existing guide to see what needs to change.  As an analogy,
accelerating from zero to sixty is a lot more difficult than switching
lanes once we're moving at speed.  Changes to accommodate the FC4 track
will be minor compared to just producing the material to begin with.

-- 
Paul W. Frields, RHCE                          http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/docs/attachments/20050406/59730af9/attachment.bin