[RFC] dumping the CED in favor of local variables

[Karsten Wade]

On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 16:50 -0700, Karsten Wade wrote:
> I'd like to recommend we dump the usage of CED files in favor of the
> local variables designation.  The CED file is a pre-compiled DTD subset.

For the record, this is a *complete reversal* of my previous position.
If Dave Pawson is lurking out there, he can laugh at me.  The rest of
you who care can swift-kick when you see/meet me next.

After working with the local variable, I am willing to undergo the pain
to change over to it.  If there is even any pain.

The only problem is _mixing_ the two formats.  If I write using the
Local Variable and you load the CED file, our indenting will be off.  At
the least, diffs will be noisy.

> <!-- Keep this comment at the end of the file
> Local variables:
> mode: xml
> xml-parent-document:("parent-file.xml" "book" "chapter")
> End:

D'oh!

that should be:

sgml-parent-document:("parent-file.xml" "book" "chapter")

I did s/sg/x/g without verifying. :)

- Karsten
-- 
Karsten Wade, RHCE * Sr. Tech Writer * http://people.redhat.com/kwade/
gpg fingerprint:  2680 DBFD D968 3141 0115    5F1B D992 0E06 AD0E 0C41   
                       Red Hat SELinux Guide
http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-4-Manual/selinux-guide/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/docs/attachments/20050427/354d5c6e/attachment.bin