PDF generation: xmlroff

Tim Waugh twaugh at redhat.com
Wed Mar 30 10:13:29 UTC 2005


On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 11:59:18AM +0200, Jos Vos wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 10:46:47AM +0100, Tim Waugh wrote:
> 
> > However, aside from images, what other things would we need from an
> > XSL-FO processor?  My thinking is that if "all" that's missing for us
> > in xmlroff is the images rewrite, it might be quite a nice project to
> > focus on.
> 
> What about FOP (Java-based, from the Apache project)?  Does that work
> with GCJ (I only tried it with Sun Java IIRC)?  It is far from complete,
> but it more or less works.

Other discussions on this list have talked about FOP, but I haven't
seen any conclusions yet.

Just pointing out that FOP is not the only other usable XSL-FO
processor out there.

Tim.
*/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/docs/attachments/20050330/3caff299/attachment.bin 


More information about the docs mailing list