Fedora docs processing (Was: [fedora-java] batik [Fwd: Re: com.sun.image.*])

[Karsten Wade]

(setting reply-to for f-docs-l, pardon the cross-post, feel free to
override headings in replies)

On Wed, 2005-10-19 at 16:11 -0700, Anthony Green wrote:	
> On Wed, 2005-10-19 at 11:31 -0700, Brion Vibber wrote:
> > I've looked a little bit at the files but haven't had a chance to try
> > actually working on it. If someone else is itching to work on it, PLEASE
> > feel free to start!
> 
> Ok, thanks for the update Brion.
> 
> I'm wondering if the simplest solution for the Fedora Docs team is for
> us to strip out Batik's JPEG handling.  Perhaps it's not required for
> their work-flow.
> 
> Karsten - can you provide some simple docs and show us how you would
> process them using a proprietary Java solution?  We should be able to
> determine from this whether or not we can ignore the problem classes (as
> a near term solution).

AFAIK, we are using PNG and EPS only for our graphics.  I don't know of
any reason we cannot strip out JPEG handling.

Fedora doc folk, what think ye?

- Karsten
-- 
Karsten Wade, RHCE * Sr. Tech Writer * http://people.redhat.com/kwade/
gpg fingerprint:  2680 DBFD D968 3141 0115    5F1B D992 0E06 AD0E 0C41   
                       Red Hat SELinux Guide
http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-4-Manual/selinux-guide/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/docs/attachments/20051019/da82dd60/attachment.bin