good <ulink> practice

[Paul W. Frields]

On Sat, 2005-09-17 at 09:07 -0500, Tommy Reynolds wrote:
> Uttered Mark Johnson <mjohnson at redhat.com>, spake thus:
> 
> > Karsten Wade wrote:
> > Here's Stuart's yum tutorial I built with FOP a few weeks ago:
> > http://people.redhat.com/mjohnson/fedora/yum-software-management-en.pdf
> > It has some urls, but I don't recall how the ulinks in the source were 
> > marked up...
> 
> I have tested both <ulink> forms using HTML and FOP.  Both forms
> render correctly.  So the choice is ours.
> 
> I'd recommend using the null content form of
> 
> 	<ulink url="http://www.example.com"/>
> 
> because it is more prone to correct usage.

I'm with you, Tommy.  It's also easier to parse the XML source visually
with this form while editing, not that this is a major concern.

-- 
Paul W. Frields, RHCE                          http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
 Fedora Documentation Project: http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/docs/attachments/20050918/e58c28af/attachment.bin