Fw: Stale Docs Memberships

[Leslie S Satenstein]

Hi Pete

I have always offered to vet (for organization, grammar, and international English, that the translators could use. 


I offered this help several times, and never heard back.   My only alternative is to wait until it is released and then use bugzilla to point out the English faults.

I am prepared to work with an author or on any document to expedite his output and to insure good comprehension of the output.  By vetting the English before it is too late, the translators will be better able to work and Bugzilla entries can be avoided.  I have  spare time available.

Cheers and



 
Regards 

 Leslie

Mr. Leslie Satenstein
SENT FROM MY OPEN SOURCE LINUX SYSTEM.




>
>
>----- Forwarded Message -----
>From: Pete Travis <me at petetravis.com>
>To: For participants of the Documentation Project <docs at lists.fedoraproject.org> 
>Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2014 2:48 PM
>Subject: Stale Docs Memberships
> 
>
>In the last meeting - and sporadically in the past - we discussed
>removing accounts from the docs FAS groups that haven't been active in a
>while.  Many
 organizations have a policy of removing commit access for
>users that have left the project. Besides the potential security issues
>with accounts that might not be under control, it just makes sense that
>people looking for a contact in a given capacity should see a list of
>people that are actually active in that capacity.
>
>The proposal that came out of the meeting was to remove accounts from
>the docs, docs-writers, and docs-publishers groups after 12 months of
>inactivity.  If we reach a consensus, I'll look at some of the methods
>used in other groups ( last FAS login, last commit, etc ) and remove
>unused accounts from these groups, and then do so again... every so
>often. Maybe once per release cycle.
>
>If a deprivileged user happens to be a Guide owner, or if a Guide owner
>is observably unresponsive, I think we should make a reasonable attempt
>to contact them before removing their privileges.  We'll
 have to discuss
>the future of the Guide as a group, assign a default bz contact, as part
>of the process, not just remove them from the groups.
>Finally, affected users should know that they're still welcome in the
>group, and they need only ask for sponsorship.
>
>Please discuss, opine, or complain about the idea now; we'll vote on it
>during the 21July meeting.
>
>
>-- 
>-- Pete Travis
>- Fedora Docs Project Leader
>- 'randomuser' on freenode
>- immanetize at fedoraproject.org
>
>
>-- 
>docs mailing list
>docs at lists.fedoraproject.org
>To unsubscribe:
>https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/docs
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/docs/attachments/20140710/943e218e/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 538 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/docs/attachments/20140710/943e218e/attachment.sig>