Governance vs. Charter

[Marcela Mašláňová]

On 11/11/2013 10:28 AM, Honza Horak wrote:
> On 11/07/2013 05:15 PM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
>> I'd rather vote about members after some period. Let's say we need a
>> year to start the initiative. After a year half of us could be replaced
>> by other members of group. All members of WG could vote about it. Only
>> half should be replaced, because at least half of members should be
>> aware of what was happening past 6 months.
>>
>> The reason for election is that our group stick to some technologies
>> which might become obsoleted. We wouldn't be so usefull as we were and
>> new guys should take charge.
>
> Replacing a half of the people sounds very reasonable; that should
> ensure good compromise between a need of fresch ideas and continuity.
>
>> Even if our group is small now, it might be an obstacle in work of other
>> WG.
>
> Sorry, I didn't get that one :) Could you be a bit more specific what
> obstacles did you mean, please?
>
> Honza

we could be stuck in our ways and refuse to see new features ;-) 
Probably wrong wording.

Marcela