Git for Copr
tadej.janez at tadej.hicsalta.si
Tue Feb 25 17:46:02 UTC 2014
On Tue, 2014-02-25 at 17:11 +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > Where do you get this impression from?
> Maintainers of packages are usually power users (at least) and again as far as I see around me, they simply do not use
Ok, I can partially agree with that. I still think WebUI is used (in
preference to other interfaces) for tasks like issue reporting or, with
GitHub, when giving inline code comments.
> But GitHub is different use case! The popularity comes from fact that you can use it as you main project page.
> It have nice front page (thanks README.md), it have issue tracker, it have wiki pages. People can easily clone it.
Yes, I see your point.
> But will maintainers of packages in env-and-stack WG use that? IMHO no (at least *I* will not use it). They will just
> use that git part. And WebUI will not help you will git pull/push.
Yes, for simple packages, git for SCM, email for issue reporting will
probably be enough. But sometimes downstream packaging is more involved
(e.g. a lot of dependencies, lots of patches on top of upstream
sources, ...) and it could use some issue tracking. Reviewing and
commenting on the SPEC files/patches would also be very convenient.
> But if you organize some voting and people will want WebUI, then ok. But best vote is if someone would say "I will do it
> and you will tell me if you like it." But I hear that very rarely. Even from myself :))
Yes, agreed, it is not enough to vote on something but rather commit to
doing it yourself or being realistic on what can be done with the
available human (and machine) resources.
More information about the env-and-stacks