Fwd: Re: Roadmap for Mono packages in Fedora ?

Vít Ondruch vondruch at redhat.com
Fri Apr 10 15:45:57 UTC 2015

Not sure what you agreed, but I can imagine that I want in Fedora latest
Ruby on Rails and in Playground maintain its older (still supported)
releases (or vice versa).

And no, doing rename reviews etc to maintain older releases in Fedora
does not scale.


Dne 10.4.2015 v 17:30 Honza Horak napsal(a):
> Haven't we agreed two weeks ago that playground packages shouldn't
> conflict with base system? that means new versions won't be in
> playground, for those pure copr should be enough.. the playground is
> supposed to be more for packages that cannot be in fedora due
> packaging guidelines issues (bundling is great example). At least this
> what I got from the meeting two weeks ago..
> Honza
> On 04/10/2015 02:46 PM, White, Langdon wrote:
>> Seems like a great oppty for a playground example... think envs and
>> stacks could follow up on this and help these guys get the existing mono
>> build they have in to playground while pkg reviews and the like take
>> place?
>> langdon
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: "Timotheus Pokorra" <timotheus.pokorra at solidcharity.com
>> <mailto:timotheus.pokorra at solidcharity.com>>
>> Date: Apr 10, 2015 2:38 AM
>> Subject: Re: Roadmap for Mono packages in Fedora ?
>> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>> <devel at lists.fedoraproject.org <mailto:devel at lists.fedoraproject.org>>
>> Cc:
>> Hello,
>> this is my first post to this list. My name is Timotheus Pokorra, I am
>> from Germany, and I am also interested to get an uptodate version of
>> Mono into Fedora and later into CentOS or Epel.
>> I am developing and deploying OpenPetra, an administration software
>> under GPL for charities and mission organisations, on CentOS.
>> https://www.openpetra.org
>> I am maintaining Mono packages on OBS for various linux distributions:
>> https://build.opensuse.org/project/monitor/home:tpokorra:mono
>> Obviously it is quite easy because there are no rules to follow.
>> I understand that a distribution like Fedora needs packaging rules,
>> and the rules have a good reason.
>>  > I am not working on this currently. Some one should inform upstream
>>  > that it doesn't build for GCC 5 / C++ 11.
>> It seems that Mono 4.0 Alpha1 builds fine on Rawhide:
>> https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/elsupergomez/mono-4/build/85185/
>> I have added a comment to:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1089426
>> IMHO I think we should focus on getting Mono 4.0 into Fedora
>> (according to the "First" foundation of Fedora...)
>> All the best,
>>    Timotheus
>> -- 
>> devel mailing list
>> devel at lists.fedoraproject.org <mailto:devel at lists.fedoraproject.org>
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
> _______________________________________________
> env-and-stacks mailing list
> env-and-stacks at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/env-and-stacks

More information about the env-and-stacks mailing list