Possible new maintainer

[Todd Zullinger]

I wrote:
> David Juran wrote:
>> To be honest, I'm not sure. I know it's been discussed on this list
>> back and forth a few times but I can't recall the outcome so I just
>> pulled the above FAQ out from google... Can anyone else  on the list
>> recall?
>
> Heh, I have similarly vague recollections.  Glad to not be the only
> one. :)

This might be the thread we were thinking about:

https://www.redhat.com/archives/epel-devel-list/2010-December/msg00102.html

That means that facter and puppet are violating this. :(

They have been doing so for years.  I strongly suspect that they were
in EPEL before they got added to MRG and no one noticed at the time.
I started helping with the packages in Fedora/EPEL around the 0.24.6
timeframe, but they entered EPEL in July of 2006, it appears.

-- 
Todd        OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If someone with multiple personalities threatens to kill herself,
would that be considered a hostage situation?

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 543 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/epel-devel/attachments/20110728/7e0b11be/attachment.sig>