[EPEL-devel] Proposal for Python 3 packaging in EPEL 7

[Stephen John Smoogen]

On 9 January 2015 at 07:38, Bohuslav Kabrda <bkabrda at redhat.com> wrote:

>
>
> Dave, thanks for the input.
> Yes, it's technically possible to put both dashes and dots in package
> name, although I'm sort of failing to see what the benefit of doing that
> would be. Is this for readability only? For me, python34-something is more
> readable than the two variants you propose (but I understand that it's a
> matter of personal preference and if majority likes one of your variants,
> we can use it).
>
>
I can actually see a reason.. when you want python310 to replace python39
using simple parsing rules. But that is just me comparing colours on the
bikeshed. [It should point south.. or you'll get the wood rot.]


> --
> Regards,
> Slavek Kabrda
> _______________________________________________
> epel-devel mailing list
> epel-devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel
>



-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/epel-devel/attachments/20150109/8c8a61cd/attachment-0001.html>