[FAmSCo] giannisk's meeting titled "FAmSCo 2016-03-02" ended in #fedora-meeting-2

[S.Kemter]

Hi,

It's not about meeting time at all, its about care more about it. Christoph
you say that Tuan also asked for another meeting time? Well its funny in
the first place, as he marked that time as available in the survey. Besides
that, he lacks not just in FAmSCo with his presence. Shall we look to the
meeting logs of the last FAmSCo? I seeing ther sesivany, robyduck and
sometimes lbazan, you and Tuan missing. And that was definitely to another
time. Not speaking about Tuans moral in doing things, September Action from
APAC meeting not done from him until yet, now done from Remy. December
action from FAD not done yet.

So from my perspective the both of you are busy with other things, that's
fine but please make the consequence out of it. If you care then reorganize
your work, that you can participate or give something up and concentrate on
lesser things.

So far I saw a lot of mails from you this morning, and since the last
meeting. Its interesting, that you woke up as the extreme measure to kick
you out came up. Half of this participation before and we would not have
that trouble now. But I saw so far nothing constructive, no suggestion how
we could work to enable you to participate. Just complaining we do wrong.


br gnokii

2016-03-03 4:34 GMT+07:00 Matthew Miller <mattdm at fedoraproject.org>:

>
> Since this is by definition a global committee, getting everyone
> together for real-time meetings is always going to be a big challenge —
> and then of course that's compounded by the fact that everyone has
> other demands and interests and lives, too.
>
> I know having a regular meeting is a functional engine for keeping a
> group like this functioning. But maybe there's another way? What if,
> every two weeks or so there is a scheduled 48-hour period for
> discussing and voting on open issues in the ticket tracker. Make quorum
> be participation in that timeframe, rather than availability at a
> certain hour. (And of course people could provide votes before if they
> know they can't make it, or even ask that a particular issue be
> postponed for more discussion.)
>
> Or something else -- I'm just throwing this out there. The goal is to
> find a way to allow participation when it's not possible to get
> everyone in the same place at the same time, while still making sure
> it's not unbounded or openended, and that there is a regular cadence
> of some kind.
>
> --
> Matthew Miller
> <mattdm at fedoraproject.org>
> Fedora Project Leader
> _______________________________________________
> famsco mailing list
> famsco at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/famsco
>



-- 
make me rich, buy my Inkscape book http://is.gd/yq5OD0 ;)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/famsco/attachments/20160303/c9f3e6df/attachment-0001.html>