KDE 4.3: configuring device actions

Patrick O'Callaghan pocallaghan at gmail.com
Fri Aug 7 16:44:36 UTC 2009


On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 17:18 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
> On Friday 07 August 2009 15:43:33 Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 13:30 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
> > > On Thursday 06 August 2009 22:17:35 Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> >
> > > > Since 4.3 seems to carry on the tradition of not
> > > > documenting anything useful*, can anyone enlighten me?
> > >
> > > Thank you.  So we'll all stop working on it until you join in and help
> > > us.
> >
> > No need to overreact. I'll admit to a certain snittiness in my remarks,
> > but it's not like this is the first time anyone has ever said anything
> > about KDE documentation. I've frequently complained about it in the past
> > and was disappointed to find that 4.3 still has holes. In fact it even
> > has missing documentation files (click on the Help button in a plasma
> > applet and get "The file or folder help:/plasma-desktop/index.html does
> > not exist".) This was also the case with earlier versions of KDE and I
> > also commented on it at the time.
> >
> > The whole point I'm trying to make is that most of the easy stuff is
> > documented, but a lot of the harder stuff isn't. Clearly if I was in a
> > position to write docs for the hard stuff I wouldn't need to ask the
> > question in my post.
> >
> No, the whole point is that documentation has to be written.  Every study 
> shows that developers are not the best people to write it, anyway.  They don't 
> see things from the same perspective as the user, and then of course many 
> (most?) of them don't speak English as a first language.
> 
> The best way undoubtedly is for those that care to start helping write 
> documentation - and UserBase makes that easy to do (any help needed in 
> starting new sections etc., please ask me).  If you do that, developers will 
> be so grateful that they'll fall over themselves to answer your questions so 
> that you can expand the help.

It's unfortunate that this has veered off into a discussion of the docs.
If you glance at my original post, that point I was trying to make was
that the configuration dialogue is poorly designed. If it were
well-designed, the docs would be much less important.

However I take your point about offering to help. You did that once
before and I never acted on it. If you point me in the right direction
I'll see what I can do.

[...]

> > That also works with Dolphin and is a valid alternative. However it
> > doesn't really answer the question. More to the point, a user who sees
> > the notification pop-up and clicks on the icon will still have to click
> > twice more to get to the file browser, which I conjecture to be by far
> > the most common case. That's just bad design.
> >
> How do you know that's the common case?  It is for you, and it is for me, but 
> for others an image viewer or media player may be their most common need.

Perhaps, but we'll never know. That's why configurability is important.

> I'm 
> totally against forcing anyone down any path.

Since we're talking about configurability, I obviously agree with you.

> For heaven's sake, I can live 
> with a couple of clicks.  Is it really that important?

Cosmically speaking, of course not. When you use the pendrive several
times a day, every time it happens it's an irritation, like squeaky
chalk on a blackboard. Since I use KDE exclusively, I want it to work
the way I think it *should* work, just for my own sake.

BTW http://www.kde-look.org/content/show.php/Device
+Manager?content=106051 shows an interesting alternative to the device
notifier, but it doesn't seem to be available for Fedora (the Install
New Widgets dialogue can't find it.)

poc




More information about the kde mailing list