kde-4.13.x for f20, include optional nepomuk support or not?

[Gerald B. Cox]

Agree.  It no longer runs and the features don't work - so why have it?


On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 9:11 AM, Rex Dieter <rdieter at math.unl.edu> wrote:

> Rex Dieter wrote:
>
> > On 06/22/2014 07:20 PM, Markus Slopianka wrote:
> >> Hi.
> >> Not sure why it seems to happen with every update but once again
> >> kde-workspace 4.11.10 tries to install Nepomuk. ;-)
> >>
> >> Is there anything we can do to help fix this?
> >
> > it's just that the nepomuk-free kde-workspace build from kde-unstable
> > got superceded by a recent update:
> >
> >
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-7457/kde-workspace-4.11.10-2.fc20
> >
> > We have concrete plans to start work on brining kde-4.13.x to f20
> > officially, but I guess we haven't decided on how best to deal with the
> > nepomuk transition yet (ie, whether remove nepomuk-related deps from
> > core kde packages or not).
>
>
> OK, kde-sig members, please add your opinion this topic ^^.
>
> I think I'm of a mind to removing optional nepomuk-related deps when
> kde-4.13.x lands, since
> * baloo migrates old nepomuk data
> * nepomukserver no longer runs, so the related features don't really work
> anymore (afaik).
>
> -- Rex
>
> _______________________________________________
> kde mailing list
> kde at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kde
> New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/kde/attachments/20140623/b02c1397/attachment.html>