kde-4.13.x for f20, include optional nepomuk support or not?

[Markus Slopianka]

While I'm not a SIG member, may I suggest that 
a.) Nepomuk will be dropped in favor of Baloo and
b.) Post announcements via the usual channels ( http://fedoramagazine.org , 
Google+, Facebook, etc.) that an update will be released and explain that the 
index will be recreated / converted and that this may take a while.
We did the same back in the day when Nepomuk 2.0 succeeded 1.x in the official 
kde.org announcement, resulting in IIRC zero "Nepomuk got buggy and eats CPU" 
complaints. <http://kde.org/announcements/4.11/platform.php>

Markus

On Monday 23 June 2014 11:11:41 Rex Dieter wrote:
> Rex Dieter wrote:
> > On 06/22/2014 07:20 PM, Markus Slopianka wrote:
> >> Hi.
> >> Not sure why it seems to happen with every update but once again
> >> kde-workspace 4.11.10 tries to install Nepomuk. ;-)
> >> 
> >> Is there anything we can do to help fix this?
> > 
> > it's just that the nepomuk-free kde-workspace build from kde-unstable
> > got superceded by a recent update:
> > 
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-7457/kde-workspace-4.1
> > 1.10-2.fc20
> > 
> > We have concrete plans to start work on brining kde-4.13.x to f20
> > officially, but I guess we haven't decided on how best to deal with the
> > nepomuk transition yet (ie, whether remove nepomuk-related deps from
> > core kde packages or not).
> 
> OK, kde-sig members, please add your opinion this topic ^^.
> 
> I think I'm of a mind to removing optional nepomuk-related deps when
> kde-4.13.x lands, since
> * baloo migrates old nepomuk data
> * nepomukserver no longer runs, so the related features don't really work
> anymore (afaik).
> 
> -- Rex
> 
> _______________________________________________
> kde mailing list
> kde at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kde
> New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org