dnf update must be wrong...

[Hernán Ramírez]

I see, something similar was happening to me with DNF, libreoffice and the
debug packages for Libre Office.

I had to uninstall the debug packages for LO, update Libre Office and then
install again the debug packages for Libre Office.

Now i understand this, it seems that we need to wait for it to get solved :
/

Hernán
El nov. 16, 2015 5:17 PM, "Eric Griffith" <egriffith92 at gmail.com> escribió:

> Dnf / Yum and PackageKit (Apper / Gnome Software / etc) don't use the same
> caches. One can tell you new updates are available, while the other
> doesn't, because the first one just updated its information but the other
> hasn't yet.  In this case, PackageKit updated itself and saw updates, but
> dnf hadn't yet. The reverse can happen too.
>
> There's ongoing work to unify the caches, but its still WIP.
>
> Don't know about your other question. Probably a PolKit policy.
>
> --Eric--
> On Nov 16, 2015 16:53, "Dariusz J. Garbowski" <thuforuk at yahoo.co.uk>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> There is something clearly broken with updates (dnf?) but I can't tell
>> what:
>>
>> 1. In KDE I get a notification that there are 6 packages to update. So,
>> as root, I run:
>>
>>
>> [root at localhost ~]# dnf repolist
>> Last metadata expiration check performed 2:22:09 ago on Mon Nov 16
>> 19:27:21 2015.
>> repo id repo name status
>> *fedora Fedora 23 - x86_64 46,074
>> rpmfusion-free RPM Fusion for Fedora 23 - Free 692
>> rpmfusion-free-updates-testing RPM Fusion for Fedora 23 - Free - Test
>> Updates 182
>> rpmfusion-nonfree RPM Fusion for Fedora 23 - Nonfree 206
>> rpmfusion-nonfree-updates-testing RPM Fusion for Fedora 23 - Nonfree -
>> Test Updates 26
>> *updates Fedora 23 - x86_64 - Updates 4,139
>>
>> [root at localhost ~]# dnf update
>> Last metadata expiration check performed 2:14:00 ago on Mon Nov 16
>> 19:27:21 2015.
>> Dependencies resolved.
>>
>> ==============================================================================================================================================================================================
>>  Package                               Arch
>>     Version                        Repository
>>                        Size
>>
>> ==============================================================================================================================================================================================
>> Skipping packages with broken dependencies:
>>  akmods                                noarch
>>     0.5.4-1.fc23                        rpmfusion-free-updates-testing
>>                            25 k
>>
>> Transaction Summary
>>
>> ==============================================================================================================================================================================================
>>
>> Nothing to do.
>> Complete!
>>
>>
>>
>> Hmmm... no packages to update. But notification lists 6 packages,
>> including ffmpeg and VirtualBox. So I run:
>>
>> [root at localhost ~]# rpm -qi VirtualBox
>> Name        : VirtualBox
>> Version     : 5.0.8
>> Release     : 1.fc23
>> ...
>>
>>
>> 2. Let's then click install in "Software Updates" notification pop-up.
>> Guess what! Packages are downloading and installing.
>>
>> Let's check:
>>
>> [root at localhost ~]# rpm -qi VirtualBox
>> Name        : VirtualBox
>> Version     : 5.0.10
>> Release     : 1.fc23
>> ...
>>
>> What??? Why hasn't dnf picked on this and updated VirtualBox?
>>
>> Bonus question: what makes it possible for regular user to install
>> packages via some widget in KDE? How to disable this?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Dariusz
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> kde mailing list
>> kde at lists.fedoraproject.org
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kde
>> New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> kde mailing list
> kde at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kde
> New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/kde/attachments/20151116/b5d22a8f/attachment-0001.html>