gtk2 on epel won't be easy
Daniel P. Berrange
berrange at redhat.com
Mon Nov 10 10:11:05 UTC 2008
On Sat, Nov 08, 2008 at 10:19:09AM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> In response to this thread:
> As the packages get added to Fedora CVS, I'm requesting EL-5 branch
> and building them. Part of the reason is that oVirt _may_ wish to
> build a Windows client on RHEL/EPEL, and they have requested this.
> Another reason is that there seems to be interest from CentOS users.
The big question for EPEL-5 branches though is what version of the
packages to build for MinGW. For the Fedora release & rawhide branches
our plan was to have each MingGW build track the version + patches
of the corresponding native build.
If we apply that logic to EPEL-5, then we shouldn't be copying the
Fedora 9 mingw packages there - we should be -resyncing them to
match the versions distributed in RHEL-5.
|: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|
More information about the mingw