[Fedora-spins] Fedora 19 Spins

[Peter Robinson]

On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Christoph Wickert
<christoph.wickert at gmail.com> wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 09.04.2013, 17:28 -0400 schrieb Bill Nottingham:
>> Joerg Simon (jsimon at fedoraproject.org) said:
>> > can you please give us a feedback regarding
>> > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/spins/2013-April/002886.html
>>
>> I am not the spin wrangler - I merely created the F19 spins page as a copy
>> of F18 because someone from QA asked me to so they had size targets, etc.
>>
>> CC'ing Christoph, he can likely give you a better answer.
>
> I agree with Bill that http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/19/Spins
> should be considered the authoritative list of spins. There is no reason
> to only go for the desktop spins and exclude old spins from reoccurrence
> if they are actively maintained.
>
> In addition to that, we have some spins listed as ready for SIG:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Spins_Ready_For_SIG
>
> I have no idea, why some of the spins are there:
>       * Design Suite was around for ages and is now actively maintained
>         again.
>       * Same for the Games spin.
>       * Fedora jam was approved be the SIG in the F18 cycle but didn't
>         make it.
>       * Java spin is new, afaik it was not yet approved. The owner seems
>         unresponsive at least he has not responded to my questions in
>         the wiki since December. Also, the board had some issues with
>         the name.

The Java spin can't be called the Java spin due to trademark issues so
if it does happen it'll have to be called something else, I can
remember this going to the board last cycle.

Peter