[Bug 475593] Review Request: fontpackages - Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475593


Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|                            |fedora-cvs?




--- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2008-12-10 15:16:37 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #6)

> -----------------------------------------------
> This package (fontpackages) is approved by oget
> -----------------------------------------------

Thank you

> Other than this, is there any draft yet for the new guidelines?

The new templates are in this rpm (FPC approved). I'll turn them in nice wiki
pages and hunt all traces of current guidelines once FESCO has approved it. I
don't really see the point of doing it before. This is quite a lot of wiki work
and if FESCO asks for changes in the templates this work will have to be done
twice.

Better to keep the proposal in one place for now IMHO.

New Package CVS Request
=======================
Package Name: fontpackages
Short Description: Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages
Owners: nim
Branches: F10, F9, devel
InitialCC: fonts-sig

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.