[Bug 1142430] Review Request: vt323-fonts - VT323 font by Peter Hull
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Sep 17 05:51:18 UTC 2014
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1142430
Parag AN(पराग) <panemade at gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade at gmail.com> ---
Review:
+ Package builds fine in mock in F22
+ rpmlint on generated rpms gave output
vt323-fonts.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US glyphs -> glyph,
glyph s
vt323-fonts.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US glyphs -> glyph, glyph
s
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
+ source verified with upstream as (sha256sum)
packaged source:
472b60323f5d128e1edf71bf0b8e54de3ee98902fb1c68b813c58fd085e3e3a8
upstream source:
472b60323f5d128e1edf71bf0b8e54de3ee98902fb1c68b813c58fd085e3e3a8
+ License is OFL and included in its own text file OFL.txt
+ fontconfig file looks good
+ follows fonts packaging guidelines.
APPROVED.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=CrERcvI2pZ&a=cc_unsubscribe
More information about the fonts-bugs
mailing list