[Bug 1142430] Review Request: vt323-fonts - VT323 font by Peter Hull

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Sep 17 05:51:18 UTC 2014


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1142430

Parag AN(पराग) <panemade at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+



--- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade at gmail.com> ---
Review:

+ Package builds fine in mock in F22

+ rpmlint on generated rpms gave output
vt323-fonts.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US glyphs -> glyph,
glyph s
vt323-fonts.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US glyphs -> glyph, glyph
s
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.

+ source verified with upstream as (sha256sum)
packaged source:
472b60323f5d128e1edf71bf0b8e54de3ee98902fb1c68b813c58fd085e3e3a8
upstream source:
472b60323f5d128e1edf71bf0b8e54de3ee98902fb1c68b813c58fd085e3e3a8

+ License is OFL and included in its own text file OFL.txt

+ fontconfig file looks good

+ follows fonts packaging guidelines.

APPROVED.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=CrERcvI2pZ&a=cc_unsubscribe


More information about the fonts-bugs mailing list