Security fad scheduling

[Stephen John Smoogen]

On 12 September 2012 11:37, Kevin Fenzi <kevin at scrye.com> wrote:
te dates? That would put us before final freeze, and
>> > unless Beta slipped 2 or more weeks we would be out of freeze.
>>
>> I honestly am going to bet on Alpha slipping one more week and Beta
>> slipping 1-2.  This is going to be one of THOSE releases and we might
>> as well decide we are going to do the FAD during a freeze or schedule
>> it after the release.
>
> Optimist! :)
>
> so, since no one replied that the above dates would work as well as or
> better than the others, I guess we should just suck it up and stuck to
> the end of nov dates.
>
> If we are in freeze then, then we are and we either use staging for all
> our setup and testing (which we probibly want to do anyhow), and/or get
> freeze breaks to implement parts of it as needed.

Actually I was thinking of putting it in the cloud. This should allow
for 2-3 versions if needed to work around and it would be completely
clear of our other networks so should not interfere.


> I guess thats the best way forward.
>
> If everyone who wishes to attend could make sure that their cost info
> is updated that would assist me in gathering up costs and such. Please
> do so asap.
>
> kevin
>
> _______________________________________________
> infrastructure mailing list
> infrastructure at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure



-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.
"Don't derail a useful feature for the 99% because you're not in it."
Linus Torvalds
"Years ago my mother used to say to me,... Elwood, you must be oh
so smart or oh so pleasant. Well, for years I was smart. I
recommend pleasant. You may quote me."  —James Stewart as Elwood P. Dowd