httpd logs

[Toshio Kuratomi]

On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 02:17:35PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> So, the recent fas vulnerability made us realize that we were not
> collecting and saving httpd logs from staging machines. 
> 
> I've since added: 
> 
> app01.stg
> app02.stg
> proxy01.stg
> 
Did you leave out fas01.stg on purpose?

> to have their httpd logs pulled over to log02 and kept. 
> 
> This however got me thinking. Since we are moving to a model where each
> app has it's own server, should we widen the servers we pull httpd logs
> from? For example, ask01/02? fedocal? blockerbugs?
> 
I think so.  If we're looking to analyze logs for tracebacks, errors, etc,
then having consolidated logging makes it much easier than logging into our
redundant servers for that service.

> Or should we figure out a better way to collect and store the httpd
> logs. 
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
I don't think we have any ideas for how to do something better
immediately... So we probably should just add all the other hosts for now.

-Toshio
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/infrastructure/attachments/20130510/358262c7/attachment.sig>