httpd logs

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Fri, 10 May 2013 11:15:56 -0700
Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 02:17:35PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > So, the recent fas vulnerability made us realize that we were not
> > collecting and saving httpd logs from staging machines. 
> > 
> > I've since added: 
> > 
> > app01.stg
> > app02.stg
> > proxy01.stg
> > 
> Did you leave out fas01.stg on purpose?

Nope. Forgot it. ;) 

> > to have their httpd logs pulled over to log02 and kept. 
> > 
> > This however got me thinking. Since we are moving to a model where
> > each app has it's own server, should we widen the servers we pull
> > httpd logs from? For example, ask01/02? fedocal? blockerbugs?
> > 
> I think so.  If we're looking to analyze logs for tracebacks, errors,
> etc, then having consolidated logging makes it much easier than
> logging into our redundant servers for that service.

Right. ok.

Would someone like to look at adding those other servers? 
Otherwise I will do it monday. 

kevin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/infrastructure/attachments/20130511/95c6f403/attachment.sig>