[release] pkgdb 1.23.99

Vít Ondruch vondruch at redhat.com
Tue Jan 27 10:49:26 UTC 2015


Dne 27.1.2015 v 08:37 Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 08:24:47AM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>> Dne 26.1.2015 v 18:54 Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
>>> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 06:14:36PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>>
>>>> Dne 26.1.2015 v 17:45 Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
>>>>> Dear all,
>>>>>
>>>>> I just pushed to stg a new version a pkgdb: 1.23.99 (pre-release of 1.24).
>>>>>
>>>>> This version is pretty big as it includes 6 months of work put in the
>>>> process
>>>>> to request new package or new branch, thus taking theses processes out of
>>>>> bugzilla.
>>>>>
>>>>> The changelog is rather short though:
>>>>> * Mon Jan 26 2015 Pierre-Yves Chibon <pingou at pingoured.fr> - 1.23.99-1
>>>>> - Update to 1.23.99 (pre-release for 1.24)
>>>>> - New processes to request a new package or a new branch of a package
>>>> directly
>>>>>   in pkgdb instead of relying on bugzilla
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Please, have a look at it, test it, break it and let us know what is
>>>> right/wrong
>>>>> with it: https://admin.stg.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/
>>>> And what is the "status" for new review? Don't think this belongs there.
>> I still don't get the status ...
> It is the status of the package but you are right, it can probably be skipped
> when requesting a package and just left to 'Approved' (as anyway the request
> will not be approved if there is a problem).
>
>>>> And what should be review URL?
>>> The button is meant to be used after the review has been completed in bugzilla.
>>> I agree that the title on the button can be confusing. Any idea for a better
>>> wording?
>> It is not obvious that the URL is supposed to be the BZ review ticket.
>> It might help.
> I will adjust the UI
>
>>>> And it finished with Internal server error when I clicked on the
>>>> "Create" button :/
>>> Yeah there was some permission issue at the DB level which I had missed.
>>> Should be fixed now.
>> Yes, I was able to request new package .... probably ... since I don't
>> know where it gone. I mean, there is list of "Recent packages added"
>> (which does not sound english to me, but I'm not native speaker after
>> all ;)), but where is the queue of "new package requests"?
> It's part of the admin interface but the API is public:
> https://admin.stg.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/api/admin/actions
> So you requested a new package called: rubygem-binding_of_caller :)

I'd love to see at least packages I requested in some UI form. Otherwise
it might happen that the request will get duplicated, because they were
not processed soon enough or I forgot that I already did that, etc.


Vít



More information about the infrastructure mailing list